And this if for the prolife Democrats among us.
A last-minute deal with a critical group of anti-abortion lawmakers Sunday afternoon sealed Democrats' victory. The leader of the anti-abortion bloc, Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., didn't get to add stricter anti-abortion language to the underlying bill, but was satisfied by an executive order signed by Obama affirming current law and provisions in the legislation that ban federal funding for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother.
Obama's Executive Order Abortion Feedback:
President Obama’s Abortion Executive Order Pleases No One — Other Than Rep. Bart Stupakhttp://thedemocraticdaily.com/2010/03/2 ... rt-stupak/The executive order the White House has prepared for President Obama to sign to restate a prohibition of federal funding of abortion has won the support of an anti-abortion Democrat in Congress — but few other partisans on either side of the abortion debate.
.. Other than Stupak, Obama’s order appears to have won over scant other support. Indeed, Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-Pa.) — Stupak’s legislative partner in an earlier anti-abortion amendment to the reform bill — rejected the order as a solution. “An executive order … doesn’t trump a statute,” Pitts says, charging that the reform bill will allow abortion funding.
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a prominent Washington social-conservative organization. “By offering an executive order as a so-called solution, President Obama is finally admitting there is a problem with a bill that would force taxpayers to pay for elective abortions for the first time in over three decades,” Perkins says.
“However, there is no way that an executive order will protect the unborn or prevent the greatest expansion of elective abortion since Roe v. Wade.
“Pro-life lawmakers would be making a serious mistake to trust those who have repeatedly attempted to mislead the American people into believing that abortion is not in the bill,” Perkins adds.
NOW 'incensed' over anti-abortion executive orderhttp://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/21/no ... ive-order/Slamming President Obama, saying that he had broken his faith with women by agreeing to issue an executive order that prohibits federal funding for abortions.
To pay for the changes, the legislation includes more than $400 billion in higher taxes over a decade and cuts more than $500 billion from planned payments to hospitals, nursing homes, hospices and other providers that treat Medicare patients.